Audacity essay grandeur moral spiritual

The problem is that the same Bishop Fellay of whom you write, is the Bishop Fellay who wrote the forward to the 700 page diatribe of Siscoe and Salza, “True or False Pope”, supporting their lengthy error which implodes under its own errant weight on page 19, whereby they have the spiritually blinded hubris to supplant the exact word of the authentic Vatican Council (I), which is “SHOULD”, and they implant their own word which suits their purpose, and that is the word “WILL”. It is as blatant an error as error can be and it definitively undermines by implosion their entire foundational premise, that being that there ever was a definitive proclamation, protected by the charism of Ecclesiastical infallibility, that there “WILL” be a Roman Pontiff until the end of time. The word, “SHOULD”, that word which the Council actually used, affirms the holy Will of Christ our Lord and Savior, as it relates to the Papacy which He commanded, and therefore as it is fully in accordance with the Will of the Son of God, the Papacy “SHOULD” continue into perpetuity, until the end of time. Almighty God does not, as He cannot, impose His Will upon His miserable human creatures, as if He did and as if He could, then He simply could not be, “Deus Caritas Est”.

Audacity essay grandeur moral spiritual

audacity essay grandeur moral spiritual

Media:

audacity essay grandeur moral spiritualaudacity essay grandeur moral spiritualaudacity essay grandeur moral spiritualaudacity essay grandeur moral spiritual